Subject matter (ratione materiae)
Informal resolution (between parties)
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Ombudsman / informal resolution
The Applicant claims that the Administration’s indication that she will only be entitled to be considered for her long service step increment in August 2028, instead of August 2026, contravenes the terms of the settlement agreement signed previously. The issues the Tribunal considered for the purpose of receivability were, therefore, whether the subject matter of the application was one of the terms of the Agreement and whether the Agreement had been implemented or not.
In the Tribunal’s view, the record did not allow to conclude that the deferment of eligibility for increment was a matter...